My friend Emily and I were recently discussing – within the context of her life – what it is about certain individuals that makes the idea of committing to them interesting and appealing.
Emily is – for lack of a better concept – sexually fluid. She toggles several sexual partners at once and has no desire to commit to anyone or even seek out commitment.
I have already told her that whatever fulfillment one committed partner provides, she is in fact having the same needs met by several, only without any duty of serious responsibility; her partners fill the space that would otherwise be left open to loneliness.
She has argued that it is not that she is incapable of deep love and commitment, but rather that she doesn’t currently care for it. A sentiment that makes me laugh while I respond with “bull. SHIT.” because even though she is seeding her needs from several sources, she is still seeding…the same need. (If Emily were standing beyond that scope of relationship / sexuality and arguing she doesn’t care for it, then her argument would stand.) And please note that there is nothing in this post which she has not already heard face-to-face, and that she knows just how much I care about her.
Our conversation was a mishmmash of pop-psychology that spanned…
…from asking the obvious:
Do we seek out only what we believe we deserve? [Read: I am unworthy of commitment and so shall only seek out environments where rejection is not a possibility. Here, the fragility of character is a lot more aggressive than most would be comfortable admitting aloud. (And anyway, is seeking commitment a reflection that we deserve "better"? Is it human nature to nest with only one, or is it a societal construct? More complex still, is it a societal construct because it is in fact healthier for society and each of us individually?)]
…to wondering if it is the exact opposite: I am too worthy and no one can meet the worth.
…to poking: maybe seeking out multiple partners is just about actively – through the body – engaging in a little revolution against norms, expectations, religious / societal demands?
…to Zen and Motorcycle Maintenance taunting: we can’t ever really know.
…and then finally landing squarely on: What makes someone interesting enough?
During that conversation, and now still, I argue that to formulate the question in this way places the onus on the other, rather than ourselves. It absolves us of our contribution, and instead places us above the relationship itself as at its core it is stating: show me why you deserve me, and if you’re lucky enough, I may just grace you with my monogamous commitment, a not so innocent and entirely arrogant and entitled demand.
Through some laughter, the mishmash made us reformulate the question to: Why are we interesting enough to be sought out?
Only instead of engaging in this side of the equation, we were side-tracked to talking about music, only to eagerly come back and ask: To which combination of ‘us’ is it worth committing?
Years back, I wrote that it must be partially about the energy created between two people; that when you are in that individual’s presence, there is a new energy that comes to life and within which you wish to remain. I still strongly believe this.
Emily mentioned ‘inspiration’, and I agree that we need to both be inspired by, and to inspire the individual.
She also stated that we have to want to impress that individual, a critical point which I believe sheds light on something deeper – the reality that we need to feel we are worthy of the person before us. (Take pause and consider that when many relationships start to fall apart, usually the very first thing said is that someone felt as though “they were being taken for granted”, which is another way of saying that their partners stopped noting what they once found “impressive”.)
And so taking this last point, we come full circle, because we need to (gently and with grace) understand our own worth, to then wish to impress it upon another. And the more I think about it, the more I believe this is maybe one of the most important keys to commitment. When you stop wanting that, you stop wanting the relationship, and instead seek out another with whom that same energy and impression starts anew.
No doubt, there are all other kinds of factors that work together to see us to commitment. Not least of which is timing, laughter, trust, silliness, honesty, and the simplest of chemical reactions.
Ultimately, as a Muslimah, I was taught and believe that [He] “created us in pairs”; whether or not we find one another is a whole other reality…and all I can do is keep on this incredible egg hunt.
I really love this entry, Maha. I love the way you’ve weaved all different aspects in and managed to make sense of something that’s so hard to flag.
It’s so difficult to figure out what makes us end up as couples. When I met my wife, we had no intention of marrying one another and that surprise was an amazing and wonderful thing. We had to overcome many obstacles but in the end, we worked together as a team and we presented a unified front that could not be cracked.
Whoever is your partner will no doubt be an extremely lucky man.
Thank you.
Thomas
Excellent read and makes me wish I could engage in such conversations with you. Lucky Emily.
Question. Do you think it’s possible that after a long term commitment, the nature of the energy changes?
If yes, then when do we stick around? When do we look for the energy somewhere else?
Thanks for your always amazing writing.
Stacey
I returned a second time to this in one night because I really love it.
A few more questions………(1) do you think there are criteria for who you could fall in love with? (2) what are they? (3) what would happen if you met someone who didn’t meet any of the criteria, or who met only some of them?
I read this out loud to my husband and we spent the last hour talking about it.
Stacey
Thomas – thank you for sharing your world, and the reality of your coming together with your wife. I have a soft spot for stories such as yours; the ones that make it against all odds. I think they are the ones that are somehow fated to real and true kinship.
Hi Stacey – thanks for your comments and questions ![]()
I love that you read this out loud to your husband!!
1) Do you think it’s possible that after a long term commitment, the nature of the energy changes?
I hope so. I mean, with time and growth…evolution of a couple together is something entirely different that the couple at the beginning. I think that change is a part of the pleasure of being in a relationship.
2) If yes, then when do we stick around? When do we look for the energy somewhere else?
I don’t think we leave unless there’s serious problems – not because of an energy change. I mean, to assume that we leave due to change is too simple, no? I think we need to accept that it’s only natural for every relationship to change – friendships to marriages. Anything else seems a little infantile, almost…but that’s just me.
3) do you think there are criteria for who you could fall in love with? what are they?
I don’t know if the word is criteria. But I do believe that there are things we seek out, regardless of whether or not we know it. Like…a sense of calm when we are around the person…a sense of loss when we’re not.
For me, specifically, a starting point – what you may call a criteria – has to be God. I need someone who believes in God – and only one God. Everthing beyond that, I have learned, is negotiable if the two individuals care enough. I find that when there is the initial chemical reaction and inclincation to one another, expected or otherwise, so many things that may have been an issue (or like a checklist) with another, don’t even cross my mind.
4) what would happen if you met someone who didn’t meet any of the criteria, or who met only some of them?
This made me giggle a little. If I liked him enough, and he made me laugh enough, and he had my back, and we reassured one another of how we felt for one another…I would happily fall into him and take it day by day while the chips fell where they were meant to…
xo m